1. It
is more scientific, since it is not based on artificial classification of
wants, as material and non-material. Robbins’ definition is independent of such
classification.
2. As
defined by Robbins, economics has a much wider content. It takes into account
all types of human wants, material or non-material, as well as all types
persons whether living in society or not.
3. Robbins
greatly widened the scope of economics. Marshall
had restricted it to wealth and activities, which related to the material
welfare of man only.
4. Robbins
made economics a positive science whereas Marshall
regarded it as a normative science. Economics was thus freed from the responsibility
of making value judgments. It had only to declare general economic principles.
It was no longer it function to examine the right or wrong of an economic activity.
5. Robbins’
definition was not charged of ‘Gospel of mammon’ and ‘Dismal Science’ like as
Adam Smith’s definition. Thus, Robbins’ definition is superior both to the
Marshallian and Adam Smith’s definition.
No comments:
Post a Comment