TYPES OF COSTS
There are many different types of
costs that a firm may consider relevant for decision-making under varying
situations. The manner in which costs are classified or defined is largely
dependent on the purpose for which the cost data are being outlined.
Explicit and Implicit Costs: The
opportunity cost (or cost of the foregone alternative) of a resource is a cost
in the most basic form. While this particular definition of cost is the
preferred baseline for economists in describing cost, not all costs in
decision-making situations are completely obvious; one of the skills of a good
manager is the ability to uncover hidden costs. For a long time, there has been
a considerable disagreement among the economists and accountants on how costs
should be treated. The reason for the difference of the opinion is that the two
groups want to use the cost data for dissimilar purposes. Traditionally, the
accountants have been primarily connected with collection of historical cost
data for use in reporting a form's financial behavior and position and in
calculating its taxes. The main function
of accountants have been reporting, stewardship and control. They report of
what has happened, present information that will protect the interests of
various shareholders in the firm, and provide standards against which
performance can be judged. All these have indirect relationship to
decision-making. Business economists, on the other hand, have been primarily
concerned with using cost data in decision-making. These purposes call for
different types of cost data and classification.
Traditional accounting data is not
directly suitable for decision-making. While accountants still rely primarily
on historical cost in determining the profit or loss of a firm, economists
prefer to use the opportunity cost baseline concept for this purpose.
The opportunity cost of a resource
can be defined as the value of the resource in its next best use, that is, if
it were not being used for the present purpose. The opportunity cost is the
benefit of using a resource for the next most attractive alternative. For
example, the opportunity cost of a student's doing a full time MBA could be the
income that he would have earned if he had employed his labor resource on a
job, rather that spending them in studying economics, accounting, and so on.
The time cost, in money terms, can be referred to as implicit cost of doing a MBA.
The out-of pocket costs on tuition
and teaching materials are the explicit costs that a student incurs while
pursuing MBA. Thus the total cost of doing a MBA to a student is implicit costs
(opportunity cost) plus the explicit (out-of pocket) costs.
Accountants typically use those
costs that are recorded in their books as representing an actual transfer of
money. These are explicit or nominal costs and after to not represent full
economic costs that should be considered in a given decision. In addition to
explicit costs the business economist uses implicit or imputed cost in evaluation
a decision.
Furthermore, in measuring the cost
of resource in use, the accountant is only concerned with its acquisition cost.
But, for decision-making purposes, we necessarily talk about future costs and
revenues, and therefore, past costs have very little relevance. Also, the
traditional accounting procedure for valuing assets on the balance sheets is
acquisition cost minus depreciation. This faulty as the true current market
value of an asset may differ from its book value.
Direct and Indirect Costs: There are
some costs, which can be directly attributed to production of a given product.
The use of raw material, labor input, and machine time involved in the
production of each unit can be determined. On the other hand, there are certain
costs like stationery and other office and administrative expenses electricity
charges, depreciation of plant and buildings, and other such expenses that
cannot easily and accurately be separated and attributed to individual units of
production, except on arbitrary basis. When referring to the separate costs of
first category accountants call them the direct, or prime costs per unit. The
accountants refer to the joint costs of the second category as indirect or
overhead costs.
Direct and indirect costs are not
exactly synonymous to what economists refer to as variable costs and fixed
costs. The criterion used by the economical to divide cost into either fixed or
variable is whether or not the cost varies with the level of output, whereas
the accountant divides the cost on the basis of whether or not the cost is
separable with respect to the production of individual output units. The
accounting statement often divides the overhead expenses into 'variable
overhead' and 'fixed overhead' categories. If the variable overhead expenses
per unit are added to the direct cost per unit, we arrive at what economists
call as average variable cost.
Private
Costs versus Social Costs: A further distinction that is useful to make
especially in the public sector, is between private and social costs. Private
costs are those that accrue directly to the individuals or firms engaged in
relevant activity. External costs, on the other hand, are passed on to persons
not involved in the activity in any direct way (i.e. they are passed on to society
at large). Consider the case of a manufacturer located on the bank of a river
that dumps the waste into water rather than disposing if of in some other
manner. While the private cost of dumping to the firm is zero, it is definitely
positive to the society. It affects adversely the people located down stream
and incurs higher costs in terms of treating the water chemically for their
use, or to travel long distances to fetch potable water. If these external
costs were included in the production costs of producing firm, a true picture
of real or social costs of the output would be obtained. Ignoring external
costs may lead to an inefficient and undesirable allocation of resources in
society.
Relevant
Costs and Irrelevant Costs: The relevant costs for decision-making purposes
are those costs, which are incurred as a result of the decision under
consideration. The relevant costs are also referred to as the incremental
costs. Costs that have incurred already and costs that will be incurred in the
future regardless of the present decision are irrelevant costs as far as the
current decision problem is concerned.
There
are basically three categories of relevant or incremental costs. These are the
present-period explicit costs, the opportunity costs implicitly involved in the
decision, and the future cost implications that flow from the decision. for
example, direct labor and material costs, and changes in the variable overhead
costs are the natural consequences of a
decision to increase the output level. Also, if there is any expenditure on
capital; equipment incurred as a result of such a decision, is should be
included in full, not withstanding that the equipment may have a useful life
remaining that the equipment may have a useful life remaining after the present
decision has been carried out. Thus, the incremental costs of a decision to
increase the output level will include all present-period explicit costs, which
will be incurred as a consequence of this decision. It will exclude any
present-period explicit cost that will be incurred regardless of the present
decision.
The
opportunity cost of a resource under use, as discussed earlier, becomes a
relevant cost while arriving at the economic profit of the firm. Many decisions
are having implications for future costs, both explicit and implicit. If a firm
expects to incur some costs in the future as a consequence of the present
analysis, such future costs should be included in the present value terms if
known for certain.
Economic Costs
and Profits: Our
earlier discussion of economic costs suggests that economists and accountants
use the term 'profits' differently. Accounting profits are the firm's total
revenue less its economic costs. But economists define profits differently.
Economic profits are the firm's total revenue less its explicit costs (explicit
and implicit, the latter including a normal profit required to retain resources
in a given line of production). Therefore, when an economist says that a firm
is just covering its costs, it is meant that all explicit and implicit costs
are being met, and that, the entrepreneur is receiving a return just large
enough to retain his or her talents in the present line of production. If a
firm's total receipts exceed all its economic costs, the residual accruing to
the entrepreneur is called an economic or pure profit.
Total
Revenue Minus
|
Economic
Cost = Economic Profit
Accounting
Cost = Accounting Profit
|
An economic profit is not a cost,
because by definition it is a return in excess of the normal profit required to
retain the entrepreneur in a particular line of production.
Separate and Common Costs: Costs can
also be classified on the basis of their trace ability. The costs that can be
easily attributed to a product, a division, or a process are called separate
costs, and the rest are called non-separate or common costs. The distinction
between separate and common costs is of particular significance in a
multi-product firm for setting up economic prices for different products.
Fixed and variable Costs: Fixed costs
are those costs, which in total do not vary with changes in output. Fixed costs
are associated with the very existence of a firm's plant and therefore must be
paid even if the firm's level of output is zero. Such costs as interest on
borrowed capital, rental payments, a portion of depreciation charges on
equipment and buildings, and the salaries of top level management and key
personnel are generally fixed costs.
On the other hand, variable costs
are those costs, which increase with the level of output. They include payment
of raw materials, charges on fuel and electricity, wages and salaries of
temporary staff, depreciation charges associated with wear and tear of assets,
and sales commission, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment