The concept
of multiplier
The
concept of multiplier was first developed by R.F. Kahn in his article "The
Relation of Home Investment to unemployment" in the Economic Journal of
June 1931. Kahn's multiplier was the employment multiplier. Keynes took the
idea from Kahn and formulated the Investment multiplier. So, the concept of multiplier
is regarded as one of the important contributions of J.M. Keynes to economics.
The economists before Keynes were not unaware of the effect of an increment in
investment on the increment of income. For example, Knut Wicksell, for the
first time, had used multiplier in the context of inflation. Similarly, N.
Johanson had explained it in 1903. But, the economists before Keynes had not
been able to explain the concept of multiplier in a clear way.
Keynes used the concept of
multiplier in the form of investment multiplier. According to Keynes,
"Investment multiplier tells us that when there is an increment of
aggregate investment, income will increase by an amount which is K times of the
increment of investment", i.e., DY=K×DI, where Y is
income, I is investment, D is change (increment or
decrement) and K is the multiplier. Then the multiplier is expressed as;
K= [ratio of
change in income to the change in investment]
The multiplier expresses a
relationship between an initial increase in investment and final increase in
aggregate income. So, the multiplier theory shows that how many times the
income increases as a result of an initial increase in investment or it is the
ratio of an increase of income to given increase in investment. For example, if
increase in investment is made by Rs. 10 lakhs. As a result, after some time
period the total income increases to Rs. 50 lakhs. The income has increased by
five times. Hence, the multiplier is 5. In the multiplier theory, the important
element is the multiplier coefficient, K which refers to the power by which any
initial investment expenditure is multiplied to obtain a final increase in income.
· Relationship
Between the Multiplier and Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC):
The value of multiplier is
determined by the marginal propensity to consume. The multiplier is large or
small according as the marginal propensity to consume is large or small. Thus,
higher the marginal propensity to consume, the higher is the value of
multiplier, and vice-versa. The relationship between the multiplier and the
marginal propensity to consume is as follows:
Total Income (Y) = Total consumption (C) + Total Investment (I)
or, Y = C+I
or, DY= DC+DI
or, DI =DY-DC ---- ® (i)
Now, by definition we know that
K=
or, DY= K. DI
or,
DI = ----® (ii)
Now
substituting the value of DI from (ii) into (i), we get
= DY- DC ----®(iii)
Further,
dividing (iii) by DY, we get
= 1 - ------®(iv)
or,
Inverting (iv), we get
K
= = =
Since K stands for multiplier, DC/DY stands for
marginal propensity to consume and 1- DC/DY stands for
marginal propensity to save (MPS) The multiplier can also be derived from the
marginal propensity to save (MPS) and it is the reciprocal of MPS, i.e., K=1/MPS.
There is an inverse relation ship between multiplier and MPS. Higher the MPS,
lower is the multiplier. Thus, the multiplier is directly related to MPC and
inversely related to MPS.
From this formula, we can compute
the various values of the multiplier corresponding to various 'MPC' as follows:
DC/DY
(MPC)
[1-MPS]
|
DC/DY
(MPS)
[1-MPC]
|
K (multiplier coefficient) [K= = ]
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1/2
|
1/2
|
2
|
2/3
|
1/3
|
3
|
3/4
|
1/4
|
4
|
4/5
|
1/5
|
5
|
8/9
|
1/9
|
9
|
9/10
|
1/10
|
10
|
1
|
0
|
¥(infinity)
|
The table shows that the size of
the multiplier varies directly with the MPC and inversely with the MPS. Since the
MPC is always greater than zero and less than one (i.e., O<MPC<1), the
multiplier is always between one and infinity (i.e., 1<K<¥). If the
multiplier is one, it means that the whole increment of income is saved and
nothing is spent because the MPC is zero. On the other hand, an infinite
multiplier implies that MPC is equal to one and the entire increment of income
is spent on consumption. It will soon lead to full employment in the economy and
then create a limitless inflationary spiral. But these are rare phenomena.
Therefore, the multiplier coefficient varies between one and infinity.
The process of multiplier operation
can be shown in figure below:
In the figure, the 45º line represents
OY income curve. C is the consumption curve having a slope of 0.5 to show the
MPC is equal to one-half. C+I is the initial consumption and investment curve,
which intersects the 45º line at point E, so point E is initial equilibrium
point where aggregate income is equal to aggregate demand (C+I), in this
condition equilibrium level of income is OY1.
Now, suppose that investment
increases by DI, as a result C+I curve shifts
upward to C+I+ DI curve. This curve intersects
45º line at the point E, which is the new equilibrium level where aggregate
income also increased by DY level of income, i.e., which
is double than the increase in investment.
Multiplier works both in the forward
direction as well as in the backward direction. If investment decreases, the
multiplier operates in the reverse direction. A reduction in investment leads
to contraction in income and consumption which causes cumulative decline in
income. On the other hand, if consumption and investment increases, the
multiplier operates in the positive direction. Thus, higher the MPC, the
greater is the value of the multiplier and vice-versa.
No comments:
Post a Comment