Friday, June 30, 2017

Distinction Between returns to a Variable Factor And Returns to Scale

Distinction Between returns to a Variable Factor And Returns to Scale
I.   Returns to a Variable Factor. The law of returns to a variable factor states that with the increase in the units of a variable factor, keeping other factors constant, the increase in total production becomes, after some point, smaller an smaller
      In this case marginal product first increase then becomes constant and finally it declines and becomes negative. Thus, the law has three stages: increasing marginal returns; diminishing marginal returns and negative returns.
II.   Returns to Scale. The term returns to scale refers to the change in output as all factor-inputs change by the same proportion in the long run.
The increase in output may be more than, equal to, or less that proportional go the given increase in factor-inputs, hence returns to scale out of three forms-increasing, constant and diminishing.  

S.N.
Returns to a Variable Factor
Returns to Scale
1
Operates in the short run
Operates in the long run.
2
Only the Quantities of factor are varied
All factor-inputs are varied in the same proportion
3
Changes in the factor-ratio.
No change in the factor-ratio
4
No change in the scale of production
Changes in the scale of production.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Cause for the operation of diminishing returns to scale

Cause for the operation of diminishing returns to scale 
As a firm expands its output, after a certain point, it encounters growing diseconomies. These diseconomies, ultimately, more than cancel out the economies of large scale production and lower down the long run average production. The economies of production are swamped by diseconomies of production.
The main diseconomies are
i.          Managerial Diseconomies. These diseconomies occur primarily because of increasing managerial difficulties. As the output grows, top management becomes eventually overburdened and hence less efficient in its role as co-coordinator and ultimate decision-maker.
ii.        Diseconomies due to exhaustible natural resources Another cause for diminishing returns to scale may be found in the exhaustible natural resources: doubling the fishing fleet not lead to a doubling of the catch of fish; or doubling the plant in meaning or on an oil-extraction field may not lead to a doubling of output.
As a result of these diseconomies of firm, long-run average and marginal cost rise with the increase in output and scale of production.
Thus, it is clear from our analysis that returns to scale have three forms increasing, constant and diminishing. The law of returns to scale with its all the three forms can be shown in one single example and diagram.

Example
Units scale of
Production

Total Production


Marginal Production


Return to Production   scale


1 Labor + 2 Ropani land
2 Labor + 4 Ropani land
3 Labor + 6 Ropani land
4 Labor + 8 Ropani land
5 Labor + 10 Ropani land
6 Labor + 12 Ropani land
7 Labor + 14 Ropani land
8 Labor + 16 Ropani land
8
17
27
38
49
59
68
76
8
9
10
11
11
10
9
8
Increasing Returns

Constant Returns

Diminishing Returns
From A to B in the diagram is the stage of increasing returns; from B to C constant returns, and from C to D is the diminishing returns to scale.




The main reason for the operation of the different forms of returns to scale is found in economics and diseconomies. When economies exceed the diseconomies, the stage of increasing returns operates; when economies and diseconomies equals each other, it becomes the stage of constant returns to scale; and when diseconomies exceeds the economies, then comes the stage of diminishing returns to scale. 

Returns to Scale

Returns to Scale
Meaning
In the run all factors are variable; hence the expansion of output may be achieved by varying all factor-inputs. When we change all factor-inputs in the same proportion, the scale of production is also changed. The study of the effect of change in the scale of production on the amount of output comes under the head of returns to scale.
Thus, the term returns to scale refers to the changes in output as all factor-inputs change by the same proportion in the long run.
Or, in other words, the law expressing the relations between varying scales of production and quantities of output is called returns to scale. In short, returns to scale refer to the effects of scale relationship.
Three Types
Now the question is at what rate the output will increase when all factor- inputs are varied in the same proportion. There can be three possibilities in this regard. The increase in output may be more than, equal to, or less than proportional to the increase in factor-inputs. Accordingly, returns to scale are also of three types-increasing returns to scale, constant returns to scale and diminishing returns to scale.

1.      Increasing Return to Scale 
Increasing Returns to scale refers to a situation where the total output increases in a greater proportion than the increase in units of factor inputs.
   When the increase in output is more than proportionate to the given increase in the quantities of all factor-inputs, it is termed as increasing returns to scale.
   For instance, if the increase in factor-inputs is 100 percent and the resultant increase in output is 150 percent, it is increasing returns to scale. We give an Illustration of increasing returns of increasing return to scale by a diagram. Form O three lines OS, OQ and OR are drawn cutting is the product curve 2, curve 3 at various points. Increasing returns to scale is shown as:
OR  > RP > PG

Or    OR1  > R1P1>  P1G1

Or    OR2 > R2P2 > P2G2






            It means in this case, a doubling of inputs results in more than doubling of output. It is explained in the following example–
      Scale of Production          Total Output
     (Machine + Labor)                 (Units)
1Machine + 2 Labor                     100
2Machine + 4 Labor                     250
Causes for the operation of increasing returns to scale
Why does increasing returns to scale operate? The reasons for the operation of increasing returns to scale are found in the form of economics of large-scale production. They are:
(i)      Labor Economies. They are also known as the economies the economies of specialization and division of labor. Division of labour and specialization are possible more in large-scale operation. Different types of works can specialize and do the job for which they are more suited. A worker acquires greater skill by devoting his attention to a particular job. Quality and speed of work both improve. This results in a sharp increase in output per man. Thus in short, with growing scale come, increasing specialization and increasing returns to scale.
(ii)     Technical economies. The main technical economies result from the indivisibilities that are characteristic of the modern industrial techniques of production. Several capital goods, because of the strength and weight required, will work only if they are of a certain minimum size. It may be technically possible to build smaller models of them; but it will not always be possible to use such models. Besides this, there is a general principle that as the size of a capital good is increased, its total output capacity increases far more rapidly than the cost of making it. To double the size and output capacity of a blast furnace for instance, we do not have to double the materials required. This is known as the principle of indivisibility 
(iii)    Marketing Economies. Advertising space (in newspapers and magazines) and time (on television radio) and the number of salesmen do not have to rise proportionately with the sales. Thus the selling cost per unit of output falls with scale. 
(iv)    Managerial Economies. Managerial economies arise from specialization of management and mechanization of managerial function. Large firms make possible the division of managerial tasks. This division of decision-making in large firms has been found very effective in the increase of the efficiency of management. Besides, large firms apply techniques of management involving a high degree of mechanization, such as telephones, telex machines, television screens and computers. These techniques save time and speed up the processing of information's.
     As the business firms continues to expand it gradually exhausts the economies, which cause the operation of, increasing returns to scale. Beyond this point, further increases in the scale of operation are accompanied by constant returns to scale.
(v)      Economies Related to Transport and Storage Costs. Because a large firm uses it’s own transport means and larger vehicles, per units transport costs would fall. Similarly, storage cost will also fall with the size.
As a result of all these economies firm's long run average and marginal cost decline with the increase in output and scale of production.
2-Constant returns to Scale
Thus the constant returns to scale means that if all factor-inputs are varied at a certain percentage rate, output will change by the same rate. 
Or, when the increase in output is proportional to the increase in the quantities of all factor-input; it is termed as constant returns to scale.
The constant returns to scale sometimes referred to by economists in managerial language, a production curve showing constant returns to scale is often called" Linear and homogeneous". The Cobb-Douglas production function evolved by American economists Paul Douglas and C. W. Cobb is a linear and homogeneous function. Following Figure illustrates content returns to scale.
OR = RP = PG
   Or        OR1 = R1P1 = P1G1
                       OR2 = R2P2 = P2G2
      Scale of Production       Total Output
     (Machine + Labor)                (Units)
1Machine + 2 Labor                     100
2Machine + 4 Labor                     200





3 Diminishing Returns to Scale
When the increase in output is less than proportionate to the given increase in the quantities of all factor-inputs, it is termed diminishing returns to scale. For instance, if the increase in factor-inputs is 20 percent and the resultant increase in output is less than 20 percent (say 15 percent) or a doubling of inputs causes a less than a doubling of output, it is diminishing returns to scale. This is explained in the following example-  
      Scale of Production          Total Output
     (Machine + Labor)                 (Units)
1Machine + 2 Labor                    100
2Machine + 4 Labor                    150
The result is diminishing return to scale. Diminishing returns to scale implies that for a given increase in output factor is required. In other words, proportionate increase in input factors will be more than proportionate increase in output. This Fig illustrates the application of diminishing returns to scale. 
Here: -
OR < RP < PG
   Or        OR1 < R1P1 < P1G1
                       OR2 < R2P2< P2G2





Intermediate Microeconomics Rate of Technical Substitution

Isoquants

Isoquants
An isoquants is a curve on which the various combinations of labor and capital show the same output. "An is product curve is a curve along which the maximum achievable rate of production is constant." It is also known as a production indifference curve or a constant production curve Just as an indifference curve shows the various combinations of any two commodities that give the consumer the same amount of satisfaction (iso-utility), similarly an isoquant indicates the carious combinations of two factors of production which give the producer the same level of output per unit of time. The Table below shows a hypothetical isquant schedule of a firm producing 100 units of a good.
Isoquant Schedule
Combination
Capital Input
Labor Input
Total Output (In units)
First
9
5
100
Second
6
10
100
Third
6
15
100
Fourth
3
20
100




This table is illustrated on the figure where labor units are measured along the X-axis and capital units on the Y-axis. The first, second, third and the fourth combinations are shown as A., B., C and D respectively. Connect all these points and we have a curve IQ. This is an isoquant. The firms can produces 100 units of output of point A on this curve by having a combination of 9 units of capital and 5 units of labor. Similarly point B shows a combination of 6 units of capital and 10 units of labor; point C, 4 units of capital + 15 units of labor and point D, a combination of 3 units of capital+ 20 units of labor to yield the same output of 100 units. A number of isoquants representing different amounts of output are known as an isoquant map. In the figure curves IQ, IQ1' IQ2 show an isoquant map. Starting from curve IQ which yields 100 units of product, the curve IQ1 shows 200 units and the Iq2 curve 300 units of the product which can be produced with altogether different combinations of the two factors. 

Law of Variable Proportions

Law of variable Proportions 
The law of variable proportions is also named as the laws of returns or the laws of returns to a variable factor.
The law states that as the quantity of a variable impute is increased by equal doses, keeping the quantities of other inputs constant, total product will increase, but after a point, at diminishing rate. This principle can also be defined thus, when more units of variable factors are used having the quantities of fixed factors constant, a point is reached beyond which the marginal product, then the average and finally the total product will diminish.'
According to Prof. Watson, "The law of variable proportions, also known as the law of diminishing returns, can be stated as follows: when total output or production of a commodity is increased by adding units of a variable input while the quantities of other inputs are held constant then increase in total production becomes, after some point, smaller."
            In simple words, the law of variable proportions (or returns to a variable factor) states that with the increase in variable factor, keeping other factors constant, the marginal product after rising to some extent becomes smaller and smaller.
Why is it called the Law of variable proportions?
            It is because of two reasons:
(i)   The factor: proportion (or factor-ratio) varies as one input varies and others are held constant. This can be understood with the help of an example. Suppose in the beginning 10 Ropani of land and 1 unit of labor are taken for production, hence the land- labor ratio was: 10 1. Now if the land remains the same but the unit of labor increases to 2, now the land- labor ratio would become 5: 1. Thus law analyses the effects of change in factor-proportions on the amount of output and therefore called the law of variable proportions:
(ii)  The return also varies non-proportionally with the change in factor-ratio: It means when one factor is varied keeping other factors constant, the input-output ratio also undergoes a change. For example, if 10 Ropani of land and 1 unit of labor give the output of 20 quintals of wheat then the ratio between labor (variable factor) and output of what is 1:20? Now if with 2 units of labor, the output increases to 30 quintals then the labor-output ratio would become 1: 15. Thus, the ratio between the variable factor and the output change and that is why it is termed as the law of variable proportions.
Assumptions    
(i)   One is variable factor and others are the fixed factors.
(ii)  It is possible to make chances in the factor-proportions.
(iii) No change in technique of production and organization.
(iv) All units of the variable factors are homogeneous
Causes of the Operation of the Law:
(i)   In the short period all factors of production cannot be varied i.e. some are fixed factors in the short-run.
(ii)  Factor of productions is not perfect substitutes.
(iii) Factors of production are scarce in relation to their demand.
Explanation of Law
            This law of variable proportion can be illustrated with the help of the following example and diagram. In this example, we have presumed that land is a fixed factor and labor is a variable factor.
Example
Fixed factor land (Ropani)
Variable Factor
Labor (VF) (Units)
TP
(Qnt.)
AP=TP/VF
(Qnt.)
MP
(Qnt.)

1
0
0
0
-
1
1
4
4
4
1
2
12
6
8
1
3
24
8
12
1
4
32
8
8
1
5
36
7.2
4
1
6
36
6
0
1
7
28
4
-8
            In this example we have assumed that sand is the fixed factor and labor is a variable factor. The table shows the different amounts of output obtained by applying different units of labor to one acre of labor to one Ropani of land, which is fixed.
Three stages of the Law
The relation between variable factor and physical output has three stages that are shown in the example as well as in the diagram. These are known as the three stages of the law




Stage I.
            In this stage total product increases at an increasing rate and the average product of labor (AP) also increases. In the beginning of this stage marginal product (MP) also increased but increases but after a point it starts to decline. Average product continues to increase till marginal product is greater than the average product. But when marginal product becomes equal to average product, the increase in average product is withheld and this is the outer limit of the first stage. In our example, the first stage, of the law runs up to four units are labor and this limit is shown by point A in the diagram. Since in this stage average product increases with the increases in the units the variable factor, it is called the stage of increasing returns.
            Why does the law of increasing return operate? Following are given its main reasons:
(i)   Indivisibility of Factors. There are some factors that cannot be purchased in parts. For example, if no generator is available in the market less than the size of 15-horse power then we have to purchase and use this generator. If at present we are not using this generator to its full capacity then with the increase in production marginal cost will decline. 
(ii)  Increase in Efficiency. If the efficiency of fixed factor increases with the increase in the quantities of variable factor, the law of increasing returns will apply.
(iii)            Fixed Factors. The cost of fixed factors is also fixed. Hence, with the increase in output per unit fixed cost will decline which in turn will lower the over all average cost also up to a certain limit.
(iv) Division of Labor. If the increase in the units of labor brings greater division of labor and specialization in the production, it will also create the conditions of increasing returns.
(v)  Optimum combination. If to achieve optimum combination of various factors of production, the increase in the quantities of a particular factor is required it will also bring increasing returns. 
Stage II.
In this stage also the total product continues to increase but at a diminishing rate. This stage goes to the point when total product reaches the maximum and marginal product becomes zero. In this stage average product goes on diminishing. It means there is decline in the efficiency of labor. In our example second stages runs between 5 units and 6 units of labor and in the diagram it is between point A and point M. In this stage both average product and marginal product decline but remains positive. This stage is known as the stage of diminishing returns also. Why does the law of diminishing returns operate? Following are given its main reasons:
(i)   Fixed Factor. The quantity of the fixed factor-input per unit of the variable input flls as more and more of the later is put to use successive units of the variable input, therefore, must add decreasing amounts to the total output as they have less of the fixed input to work e.g. land is a fixed factor.
(ii)  Scarcity of Factors. Factors of production are scarce and limited in supply. If factors had not been limited, this law would also not have come into existence.  
(iii)            Imperfect Substitutes. Factors of production cannot be substituted fully. For example, labor or capital cannot be substituted in place of land.
(iv) Optimum Combination. These are an optimum combination pf different factors that gives the maximum output. When we increase a particular factor of production beyond this optimum combination, marginal product of that variable factor declines naturally.
Importance
Samuelson has regarded the law of diminishing returns as a natural Law. Since this law is applicable in all the fields of production, it is called as the universal law of production. Many principles of economics such as the Malthusian theory of population, Ricardian theory of rent, marginal productivity theory of distribution are based on the assumption of the law of diminishing returns. Though this law is applicable in all fields yet it is more applicable in the fields of agriculture. The main reason behind this is that in agriculture nature plays a greater role than the man. In the words of Wick steed the law of diminishing returns " is as universal as the law of life itself." The universal applicability of this law has transcended economics to the realm of science. Above all, it is of fundamental importance for understanding the problems of under developed countries.
Stage III.

In the third stage total product starts to decline and marginal product becomes negative. That is why total product curve starts to decline and marginal product curve goes below the X-axis. In our example this stage comes when 7Th and 8th units of labor are employed and according to diagram this stage starts when more than OM units of labor are employed. This stage is called the stage of negative returns



TYPES OF MICRO ECONOMICS

     The analysis of microeconomics is always affected by time period. But there are still some economists who do not believe the time value...